How the Intercept Is Fueling the autonomous Civil War

The nationwide security site has found fresh power as a savvy, progressive strike dog in nationwide politics. However is the undermining its very own side?

Steven Perlberg is a journalist in Berlin that previously functioned for BuzzFeed News and the wall surface Street Journal.

You are watching: Is the intercept a reliable news source


As the party grapples v fractures emerging in the coalition, the Intercept is a crowbar working those fractures apart, probing difficult at fault lines prefer criminal righteousness reform, “Medicare because that All,” the “Green new Deal,” racial justice and also corporate funding of candidates favor Kelly. The outlet has end up being a regimen headache because that the autonomous establishment and its leadership. It published a leaked recording of then-House democratic Whip now-Majority Leader Steny Hoyer pressuring a steady Colorado major candidate come drop out of a race. By far its favorite target has been the party company that functions to elect Democrats come the House, the democratic Congressional campaign Committee, i beg your pardon the Intercept has repeatedly pilloried for seeking come kneecap a brand-new wave the insurgent lefties. In a march story, the Intercept hammered the DCCC for relocating to blacklist consultants working with main challengers to autonomous incumbents.

The Intercept has also offered a communication to the candidates the favors. Throughout the 2016 presidential primary, the site was one of the few outlets to take Bernie Sanders seriously early on on, and also its coverage of the 2018 midterms assisted to promote progressive outsiders like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Rashida Tlaib.

In today’s fast-moving media environment, watch every choice elevates a new publication to the center of the conversation. In 2008, there to be the Huffington Post and also; 2012 experienced the climb of BuzzFeed; in 2016, Breitbart revolutionized the conservative media landscape. Together 2020 approaches, some check out the Intercept together the political site of the moment, a disruptive force focused on one of the most important political stories of our time, the autonomous identity crisis.

“I think they have played one extraordinary duty in covering concerns that don’t frequently get attention from various other outlets, and also they are regularly ahead that the curve in identifying problems that might resonate through other progressive voices,” states Congressman Ro Khanna, a steady who has actually been on both sides of the Intercept treatment.

But together it gears up for 2020, the Intercept deals with some big questions. One is whether its owner supports the war it is waging. The Intercept is virtually totally sponsor by a solitary billionaire backer, eBay founder Pierre Omidyar, that supports the website through parent organization very first Look Media. Omidyar, who v a spokesperson decreased to comment because that this story, appears to live in a different political reality from his very own publication. Intercept web links are noticeably missing from his Twitter feed, which is filled through reflections ~ above a claimed Trump-Russia conspiracy—pitting Omidyar against Intercept co-founding editor and columnist Greenwald, a deep skeptic of the media’s coverage that the Russia scandal. And unlike the heroes the the Intercept’s politics coverage, Omidyar isn’t part left-wing outsider; he is a mainstream democratic donor and also was even a support of the conservative “Never Trump” at sight PAC. Several human being I spoke to—sources inside the firm and other media observers—are now asking: just how much much longer will the billionaire patron bankroll a news outlet so clearly at odds v his very own politics?


The Intercept deals with a political question, as well: as the democratic Party strives to mount a coherent attack versus a president it loathes, will certainly the site’s belligerent strategy it is in effective, or will certainly it handicap the just Democrats who have actually a serious chance of recording the White House? depending on whom friend ask, the Intercept is one of two people cleansing the democratic Party and pushing it to be an ext accountable to voters and regular people—or the is a Breitbart that the left, smuggling in drive-by fight pieces, an approach that will eventually undercut the larger goals the website supports. Says one autonomous operative, frustrated through the Intercept’s relentless assaults on the autonomous center: “Grim apparently doesn’t ever want to success an choice again and also is dead set against anyone that does.”


Much that the Intercept’s recent shift can be traced come Grim’s arrival. A HuffPost veteran hired in 2017, Grim took a site with strong gadfly tendencies and nudged it in a much more aggressive and also political direction. He is pugnacious ~ above Twitter, and also occasionally in genuine life—he became a sort of individual hero among the left because that scrapping v Fox News organize Jesse Watters in a caught-on-tape fistfight at a 2016 White residence Correspondents’ Dinner afterparty.

From the Intercept’s Washington bureau, kitty-corner from the White House, Grim leader the site’s nine-person politics team. The sees himself less as a partisan warrior than a serious journalist whose politics and understanding that the left assisted him to train his sights on specifically important targets. “The an initial goal is to rest news,” he stated in one interview, “but where we focus is where other outlets space afraid come go.”

After the election, Reed rental Grim to take over in D.C. Due to the fact that 2009, Grim had functioned in HuffPost’s D.C. Bureau, departing the publishing as the newsroom’s management shifted in the wake of Arianna Huffington’s exit. Grim was—and is—seen in Washington as hardworking, talented and, depending wherein you sit, other of a left-populist assault dog. “A the majority of the heritage liberal media was basically in the establishment autonomous tent,” says Zaid Jilani, a previous Intercept reporter. “Ryan was a Nader voter. That probably unique to have actually someone choose that running your shop.”

Under Grim, the Intercept more plainly carved out its terrain top top the politics map. Today’s Intercept melds together a arsenal of policy interests that feels practically unique in today’s media, giving a one-stop-shop for progressive welfare state enthusiasts, anti-interventionists and surveillance paranoids. “There’s constantly been some facet of left media that had actually both an attention in growing the volume of the state to take care of people and also to attend to social concerns, while also being cynical of state power when it comes to police and immigration enforcement,” Grim said me. “That’s no necessarily new, however what’s brand-new is the there’s currently a massive audience ... For the perspective.”

The site has delighted in a flurry of politics scoops in current months, favor Grim’s revelation the the democracy on the Senate Judiciary Committee had actually requested to see a “document” regarded Brett Kavanaugh’s nomination come the can be fried Court—a story that set in motion the gripping public testimony that Christine Blasey Ford. Grim and Intercept reporter Alleen Brown additionally landed a mammoth White residence scoop once they (along with the day-to-day Mail) reported that previous Trump aide rob Porter’s ex-wives both alleged the he had physically abused them.

The Intercept’s fans credit transaction the outlet v dedicating resources to covering big issues that often get small attention somewhere else or arise later in the mainstream media, indigenous Yemen to Saudi Arabia to the “Abolish ICE” movement. Several of the site’s biggest wins walk under the radar, prefer in March, when the federal Election the supervisory board handed out its third-largest financial penalty in background in the wake of one Intercept report into international money supplied in support of Jeb Bush’s 2016 presidential candidacy. The FEC fined the pro-Bush super PAC and also a Chinese-owned copy, group after project Legal Center, a nonprofit, filed a complaint that quote the Intercept’s reporting of the donation.

Intercept headlines have tendency toward the flashy, with stories that space hyperaggressive toward those the publication deems too moderate. That technique can result in clumsiness, as once the website last year had to walk back a story that originally reported as reality that DCCC-backed candidate Gil Cisneros had actually left a article on the answering machine of his challenger saying he was about to go negative. The Intercept also devoted plenty of favorable coverage come a hold of steady candidates who lost their primaries or—perhaps more damaging to the party—lost winnable races to republic in 2018 (Intercept haters often allude to Kara Eastman in Nebraska and Dana Balter in new York). Grim says it’s not the Intercept’s job to guess winners, and that he likes come cover exciting races that have the potential to it is in close.


The Intercept has, however, picked part victors, and also its top case to progressive credibility can be summarized in 3 letters—AOC. In may of last year, reporter Aída Chávez and also Grim composed a lengthy story v a bolder headline: “A Primary against the Machine: A Bronx Activist Looks to Dethrone Joseph Crowley, The King the Queens.” For numerous readers in Washington, it to be the very first they had heard of Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. That story kicked off an ext assertive Intercept reporting on she long-shot campaign, and the Intercept published a series of punishing stories about AOC’s competitor, incumbent Democrat Crowley. (Sample headline: “How people Close come Joe Crowley Have obtained Rich when the monarchs Boss has actually Risen in Congress.”)

Waleed Shahid, interactions director for Justice Democrats, the steady political activity committee that backed AOC, states the Intercept was an essential to Ocasio-Cortez’s election. What makes the Intercept important, Shahid says, is the it has an outsider, accountability approach, but additionally “ the an are where they space actually part of the Washington media scene.”

To part readers top top the left, the Intercept’s expertise offers it a competitive advantage. “It’s a an extremely rare media company that understands and also cares to know the steady perspective and, in ~ the very same time, is taken seriously in Washington,” claims Cenk Uygur, founder of progressive YouTube staple The Young Turks, wherein Grim is a contributor. Bhaskar Sunkara, founder the socialist newspaper Jacobin, adds: “I regularly feel like when it concerns this space, Jacobin and also the Intercept are the only reliable areas that left politicians have—which is funny due to the fact that neither of united state existed 10 year ago.”

Khanna, the gradual congressman and frequent receiver of hopeful Intercept coverage, claims he an initial heard about AOC with an Intercept story. But in the primary, that hedged his bets, choosing to endorse both her and Crowley. In a long article around his decision, the Intercept created that it would “leave a mark on Khanna together he navigates his future in Congress and also within the gradual movement.” Khanna claimed he believed the story to be fair, and also he currently calls the dual endorsement a mistake: “If I had read much more of your AOC coverage, ns may have actually endorsed she earlier and may have avoided endorsing Crowley.” He likewise offered his partner a item of advice: review the Intercept to stay ahead the “spotting the steady flash points.”

For some on the left, that a suggest of pride not to worry about what the Intercept has actually coming. “Superficial talking points room not going to get you through—in truth are frequently jumping ~ above those and also carving those up,” states Faiz Shakir, 2020 project manager because that Sanders. Other autonomous staffers because that candidates who have actually been on the receiving finish of the Intercept treatment inquiry whether the all that influential. “I think they have actually a singular and very influential purpose. They drive attention and also money to challengers in different races,” states one aide come an facility Democrat who has actually been top top the receiving end of the Intercept treatment. This aide doesn’t lot see the Intercept relocating the needle amongst people making “power decisions,” but rather thinks the site functions chiefly come “torpedo candidates.”


That’s a charge numerous political operatives echoed to me—if readily available a possibility to do so turn off the record. The Intercept’s “out because that blood” approach, some Democrats argue, is totally wrong for a moment where the party’s sole emphasis should it is in on beating Donald trump in 2020. “The Intercept at its best is as soon as it’s law the tough work the others will not do, and it’s not an oppo drop,” states one autonomous operative. “The Intercept in ~ its worst is once it’s ideology with a tiny work.”

Even gradual voices in the trenches have actually their doubts. “The type of antagonistic format of journalism that you need to do to report on surveillance abuses and police abuses, ns think, doesn’t necessarily translate as well when you’re law intra-Democratic Party things,” claims Sean McElwee, co-founder of progressive think tank Data because that Progress, and also a lefty warrior generally in the mix top top intramural autonomous squabbles. “Democratic voter don’t think the Kamala Harris is the indistinguishable of the surveillance state. I think a lot of of world are concerned around her prosecutor record, but they still favor her.”

Fang, a longtime reporter in ~ the Intercept covering affect peddling and also policy, claims he thinks most of the democratic criticism the the Intercept is unfair. “The same world who desire to vilify us for championing steady causes and also holding business-friendly candidates under near scrutiny space at the exact same time happy to use our investigate to pummel Republicans,” the says.

Although some Intercept staffers find the site’s political rotate inspiring—“We have found our sweet spot,” claims Maryam Saleh, a reporter and also editor in the Intercept’s D.C. Bureau—others concern the site is ending up being too much a device of the emergent Sanders-AOC-Elizabeth Warren left, specifically given that the Intercept was established on an editorial ethos clearly antagonistic to any sort the power. “When I functioned there, I additionally felt choose I was taking a side much more than I want to, looking earlier at it,” says Jilani, the former reporter who left the publication last year and also now works as a writing other at college of California, Berkeley. “The editorial leaning has end up being so strong.” (In an answer to Jilani’s accusations, Grim chuckled and also said, “I love Zaid.”)

If the Intercept had a reasonably clear hero and also villain in the 2016 autonomous primary, 2020 is already proving come be an ext complicated. Or at least an ext crowded. Warren is most absolutely on the site’s great side, vice versa, candidates choose Beto O’Rourke and Cory Booker have actually received tougher coverage. Kamala Harris and Joe Biden—a previous prosecutor and a onetime enemy of school busing, respectively—have no shot at winning the Intercept primary. The publication has criticized councilor Kirsten Gillibrand because that defending the filibuster, released a 35-minute leaked record of Booker speaking v activists native the American Israel windy Affairs Committee, and dove right into Harris’ first race in mountain Francisco, wherein she campaigned top top a tough-on-crime platform.

As in 2016, Sanders is a clean Intercept favorite. In March, Briahna Gray, a columnist and senior politics editor because that the site, joined the Sanders project as national press secretary—no surprise to anyone reading her Intercept coverage. (Her final column was headlined, “Bernie Sanders Asks the Right inquiry on Reparations: What Does that Mean?”) however the publication has additionally picked its moment to pursue the senator, prefer a recent story by Grim phone call on Sanders release his taxation returns, which the senator at some point did.


Much of the innate distrust that the Intercept amongst the mainstream democratic apparatus stems native the lengthy shadow that the publication’s co-founder, the singular glen Greenwald. Today, he features as a columnist—both Greenwald and also the editorial employee agree the he has no control over the news reporting. But he stays the Intercept’s best-known personality, thanks to his high windy profile and also his regimen hits ~ above Fox News. Greenwald has additionally been a large line-item top top the site’s budget; as the Columbia Journalism Review freshly noted, citing the site’s publicly accessible financial disclosure forms, he soaked up $1.6 million native 2014 to 2017.

As among the top voices pooh-poohing special counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia investigation right into the trumped campaign and also condemning the media frenzy approximately it, Greenwald has actually been ~ above a Twitter win lap to his much more than 1 million pendant in recent weeks, provoking eye rolls from no only much of the autonomous left but additionally many the his partner in the Intercept newsroom.

Reed and also Grim argue the the Intercept can—and does—credibly cover the Russia story, even if the site’s most renowned employee is likewise one that the most vocal Russia unbelievable on the Internet. He’s an island, the defense goes, and also letting your employees openly i dont agree is a an ext transparent technique than at most other outlets. “We provided to joke at an early stage that we were valley Greenwald’s blog, but I think we have graduated native that,” Reed says. “He respects the he is not in management, and also he’s no an editor here.”

But internally, part employees speak Greenwald’s existence undermines the site’s work. “People i think Glenn’s tweets reflect some type of interior consensus, however the reality is i don’t think yes a solitary other person right here who agreed with him ~ above Trump/Russia,” states one Intercept staffer. “I’d hope human being don’t view us as less legitimate just since of one guy.”

Greenwald himself says the interior disagreement is healthy. “By and also large, the Intercept is now perceived together a serious midsized news outlet that absolutely does have actually its own identification separate and also apart native me,” the says. As soon as it involves his access time on Fox News v Tucker Carlson, the says, “Three million world still watch Fox News, and I think that if you think in points you’re saying and believe in the power of reason and also dialogue—which i do—you have to want come maximize the variety of people you’re speaking to.”

As a counterbalance to Greenwald, the Intercept in 2017 lugged on veteran brand-new York Times nationwide security reporter James Risen, who has written around the Mueller examination from the contrary perspective. The website has also hosted debates in between the two. Under the circumstances, it’s relatively cordial. Greenwald states Risen is just one of his journalistic heroes. Climbed told me: “Not come be also flip, however there were several op-ed columnists at the brand-new York time that ns disagreed with, however I ongoing to carry out my very own job.”


Just as the Intercept has come right into its newfound political identity, that is additionally facing questions about its long-term viability. The Intercept is still a fairly small site, averaging around 4 million distinctive visitors a month, follow to a agency spokesperson. It is currently housed under very first Look Media Works, the nonprofit arm of Omidyar’s media business. The nonprofit additionally operates field of Vision, a documentary movie unit, and also the Press liberty Defense Fund, which offers legal assistance to reporters and also whistleblowers. (The broader First Look additionally operates two various other properties, the visual storytelling website Topic and the Nib, a comics publication).

Reed says she speaks with Omidyar—who, follow to Forbes, is precious $12.4 billion—once or twice a year. “He’s an extremely much concentrated on making certain the in its entirety institution is healthy, however he no get affiliated at every in any means in any type of editorial matters,” she says.

According to tax filings freshly highlighted by CJR, Omidyar poured $87 million into first Look indigenous 2013 to 2017. When the Intercept had actually its splashy launch, that promised come invest $250 million that his personal fortune right into the enterprise—which argues it still has some to run room, despite his generosity i will not ~ be unlimited. Recently, like plenty of media outlets in search of new revenue streams, the site began a paid membership program, i beg your pardon a firm spokesperson says has actually reached 22,000 members. Still, Omidyar contributes the vast bulk of the site’s funding, and the site’s future is virtually wholly attached to his continued interest.

“We space grateful for the ongoing financial support of Pierre Omidyar, who started FLMW with the mission of fostering, promoting and strengthening elevation journalism,” the agency spokesperson says.

Five year on, the Intercept is growing other parts of that business—a more robust opinion section and a podcast unit—to lug in a larger audience. In 2017, the publishing hired Mehdi Hasan as a columnist, and his role has expanded to hosting “Deconstructed,” one interview-format podcast and also a enhance to the site’s other podcast, held by Scahill. “Deconstructed,” like other liberal podcasts such as “Pod save America,” has actually quickly become a stopping suggest for candidates trying to with a young, gradual audience. For this reason far, Hasan has actually interviewed Warren, Sanders and South Bend, Ind., market Pete Buttigieg as they embark on their early on 2020 media tours.

Still, the recent March layoffs—a 4 percent reduced in staff—coupled through the decision come ditch the Snowden archive have raised fears within the Intercept about the future the the company. In this the Intercept isn’t unique; over there is deep uncertainty throughout the entire media spectrum, and also the Intercept’s newsroom is amongst a wave of digital publishers that have actually unionized in an initiative to safeguard employees. Currently that the is clear there space “budget constraints,” as Reed explained the instance to me, part in the agency wonder what would certainly happen, for instance, if Omidyar chose to traction the plug. Would the Intercept survive?

Reed states Omidyar is fully committed to the site’s mission and editorial independence. When it pertains to the cutbacks, Reed says the publishing still has researchers ~ above staff; she adds that the company specialized lots of sources to the Snowden archive end the past 5 years, however the nature that the news cycle has meant the it had yielded a diminishing return end time.

With Grim as bureau chief, the Intercept’s Washington office has become a much more typical, fast-paced D.C. Newsroom, eclipsing the slower, magazine-like investigative procedure in brand-new York, whereby the majority of the site’s 54 employees space based. Part staffers told me they have begun to wonder if a new Intercept has taken shape—one focused more on national politics than its national security DNA. Reed claims the website is quiet “totally cursed to national security reporting,” and also that the agency has revised its guidelines for whistleblowers, to protect against future leakers from enduring the fate of reality Winner.

See more: Is Mars Able To Support Life, Life On Mars: Your Questions Answered

The Intercept has clearly gone all-in ~ above the 2020 race, however, placing itself at the facility of a significant story top top the left, as the democratic Party redefines itself in a changing America. As for the future the the site itself, Grim is at least somewhat sanguine.

“I constantly assume the the people is walk to autumn apart the following day,” Grim says. “And that every work you’ve acquired is a gift.”