Florida’s measure up forbids law enforcement agencies and also local governments from adopting policies that limit participation with commonwealth immigration authorities.

Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis, who made the ban a campaign promise, signed the bill right into law on Friday, an ext than month after ~ state legislators passed it.

“We got it done,” DeSantis told a group of cheering supporters.

You are watching: Is kansas city a sanctuary city


that the latest relocate by a state come take immigrant matters right into its own hands, specifically around a controversial concern that’s end up being a politics lightning rod: deserve to local governments limit their teamwork with the feds as soon as it pertains to immigration enforcement?

movie critics — including President Donald trumped — say local sanctuary policies endanger publicly safety, however his administration’s initiatives to cut off federal funding to so-called sanctuary cities have been stymied so far by numerous court challenges.

supporters of sanctuary policies argue they keep communities safe by fostering trust in between immigrant communities and also law enforcement. Many of the largest cities in the country have such plans in place.

Meanwhile, an ext than 30 bills related to sanctuary plans – both because that and against them – space pending throughout the country, follow to the nationwide Conference the State Legislatures.

State legislator behind such procedures – plenty of of which room being passed in states that don’t have actually sanctuary cities to begin with – say their aim is to prevent local federal governments from it spreads widespread sanctuary policies, and also punish any that do. But battles over just how much authority they have to do that could end increase in court.

here’s a look at other states that have actually passed actions banning sanctuary cities, and states that room weighing even if it is to monitor suit:


The state’s controversial 2011 legislation aimed at cracking under on illegal immigration, HB 56, also included a half on sanctuary cities.


The united state Supreme Court to win down many of SB 1070, the Arizona bill that sought to give local authorities an ext power to enforce commonwealth immigration laws. Yet it preserved in place the section that requires neighborhood police to check someone’s immigration standing while enforcing other laws if they think someone might be in the nation illegally.

Effectively, that provides it difficult for any local government to prevent cooperating v the federal federal government to some degree on immigrant enforcement. However activists in at the very least one city space trying, circulating a petition because that Tucson, Arizona, to come to be a sanctuary city – and to gain that measure on the November ballot.


This state’s lawmakers authorized a measure banning sanctuary urban last month. Together the bill, SB411, make its method through the state legislature, Gov. Asa Hutchinson – a former Department of homeland Security official – had initially expressed pertains to that a provision permitting law enforcement policemans to protect against people and question them around their immigration standing would encourage racial profiling.

however after the measure passed, follow to the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Hutchinson said reporters he’d decided to sign it because the lawmaker sponsoring the bill had actually promised to amend that provision in a future vote.

Hutchinson signed the bill right into law ~ above April 17, spokesman J.R. Davis said.


In 2009, Georgia pass a regulation banning sanctuary cities.

The state also passed a measure in 2006 requiring local federal governments to send an annual certification the they don’t have sanctuary policies in order come receive federal government funds. And also in 2017 the state’s governor signed a bill that bans sanctuary policies at private colleges.


Iowa lawmakers passed a measure up last year requiring state law enforcement come comply with detainers – requests that commonwealth immigration authorities do for regional jurisdictions to host undocumented suspects for an additional 48 hrs after they’re reserved to be released.


over there aren’t currently any type of sanctuary urban in Mississippi, but that didn’t avoid state lawmakers from giving a half on them previously this year, follow to The Hill.

The measure blocks counties, cities and colleges “from creating, planning, implementing, assisting, participating in, or allowing a sanctuary policy.”


lawmakers in Missouri pass a state immigration regulation in 2008 that reduced off grant funding to sanctuary cities.

among its authors: immigrant hardliner Kris Kobach, that was a regulation professor in ~ the college of Missouri, Kansas City at the time.

north Carolina

lawmakers in this southerly state pass a ban on sanctuary urban well prior to Trump take it office. Then-Gov. Play McCrory signed the measure ago in 2015.

now legislators have taken up the matter again. A proposal that would certainly strip state revenue sources from sanctuary jurisdictions is make its means through the legislature.

southern Carolina

courts struck down many of southern Carolina’s 2011 immigration law. However some of it stays on the books, including a component that says no local entity have the right to restrict the enforcement of federal immigration laws, follow to a report indigenous the academy for southern Studies.

critical year the state also passed a measure up requiring local governments to send an yearly certification the they don’t have sanctuary policies in order come receive federal government funds. And last month the state’s governor signed a bill that bans sanctuary plans at personal colleges.

together the Post and Courier newspaper report in March, “it took virtually 600 documents, numerous signatures from regional officials and hours of work by law enforcement personnel to tell southern Carolina’s leaders what they admittedly knew: the state doesn’t have any so-called sanctuary cities.”


This state also passed a ban on sanctuary cities in 2009. Currently a state senator states he’s propose a new measure the “has teeth.” SB 155 states local governments that adopt or spreading a sanctuary policy won’t be eligible because that state funding until they rescind or repeal the measure.

residence Bill 2315 claims local governments that take on or enact a sanctuary policy won’t be eligible for state grants till they rescind or repeal the measure.


Gov. Greg Abbott signed a invoice banning sanctuary cities in his state in 2017.

The measure, recognized as SB4, was blocked by a reduced court just prior to it went into effect, but an appeals court ruled in 2018 that many of the law deserve to remain in effect while the court case an overwhelming it dram out.

See more: Eek! Here’S What To Do I Popped A Pimple And Blood Came Out Of It?

the decision applied to all yet one delivery of the measure, which would certainly punish neighborhood officials for “endorsing” policies that limit enforcement of immigration laws.

claims where bills are pending

In enhancement to the states in-depth above, follow to the nationwide Conference that State Legislatures, as of April 2019 at least 21 state legislatures were weighing measures versus sanctuary policies: